Physicians and lawyers: science, art, and conflict.
نویسندگان
چکیده
The relations between physicians and lawyers have deteriorated rapidly over the past several decades, most particulary since the early 70s when the perception that a medical malpractice crisis existed in America became widespread. Some believe that the factors dividing the two professions are linked (1) to professional jealousy, (2) to sometimes conflicting economic interests, or (3) to difficulties in communication, since both professions use many of the same words, or terms of art, but with different intended meanings. While the authors agree that these factors may have aggravated the problem, they believe that the conflict's real roots are in the very different ways in which physicians and lawyers are trained and in the different epistemologies that each profession has accepted, as a result of which each reasons and solves problems in a manner that not only diverges from but sometimes contradicts the other's. The authors conclude that only as the varying epistemologies begin to converge can physicians and lawyers begin to approach problems in more similar ways, and to discover the underlying compatibility of many of their interests and goals.
منابع مشابه
Defining the role of the physician: medical education, tradition, and the legal process.
Physicians today are facing numerous and powerful attacks on the exercise of many of their most basic functions. If asked to identify one source most responsible for these challenges, many physicians would name the legal profession. Legal intrusion into the medical profession goes beyond challenges to the physician's income; it threatens what many physicians believe to be the traditions that ma...
متن کاملAssessment of Decisional Conflict about the Treatment of Trigger Finger, Comparing Patients and Physicians
Background: As an early step in the development of a decision aid for idiopathic trigger finger (TF) we were interested in the level of decisional conflict experienced by patients and hand surgeons. This study tested the null hypothesis that there is no difference in decisional conflict between patients with one or more idiopathic trigger fingers and hand surgeons. Secondary analyses address ...
متن کاملMentally Retarded Persons Offences; Causes of Crime and Prevention from the Perspective of Police Officers, Lawyers and Judges
This study aims to identify and prioritize the most serious crimes committed by mentally retarded people, causes and factors to prevent the commission of a crime from the perspective of police officers, lawyers and judges are doing... -member , which included set high standards seventh. Results: Results of this study showed that Lowest and the most frequent crimes committed by mentally retarded...
متن کاملWhat Do Clinical Professors of Hamadan University of Medical Sciences Know About Conflict of Interest in the Fields of Research, Education, and Treatment? A Qualitative Study
Background and Objective: Conflict of interest is a situation in which professional judgment about a primary interest is unjustifiably affected by a secondary one; therefore, it is a subject that occurs objectively. Also, conflict of interest is not inherently immoral; however, the way to deal with these conflicts is a matter of professional ethics. Materials and Methods: The present qualitati...
متن کاملEconomic Efficiency of Transfusion Medicine Law
Transfusion medicine, which involves taking blood from the donor to the stage after the blood transfusion to the recipient and the subsequent care of him/her, is presented as one of the most innovative ways in modern medicine in the world and with the new dimensions of its therapeutic and therapeutic applications, are faced with ambiguity, overview and morelegal and ethical gaps in this field. ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- American journal of law & medicine
دوره 6 2 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 1980